1501ART
New Communication Technologies
Essay
Megan Pope-s2676113
Thursday 1-3pm
Chris Mamo Zelos
How Television Interacts As A One Way Communication Platform.
Television was once a black and white box which showed us the technology of the future, but since its humble beginning the television has evolved into an interactive medium which influences the way we view programs.
The first television was created in 1926 by John Baird who created the first workable television set out of a series of strips of light and shaded images. In 1928 Baird “created colour television by scanning in primary colours” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) onto alternative strips of the shaded images to create a moving colour image. The television proceeded to evolve through time and in the 1930’s the invention of the iconoscope “saw a boom in television technology” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) with more companies getting involved with the television market. As this new technology developed so did the televisions development in Britain with a “total television system including a camera tube known as an Emitron”( Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) being created by a British research group. In 1938 another breakthrough occurred in the field of television with the creation of a “transmission system that could that could be received by both black and white and colour sets” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834). After the basic transmission system had been created the worldwide invasion of television began with it soon invading households around the western world. (Inside the Magic Rectangle: Recent Research on the History of Television, J. Foot, 1992) (The History of Television, Jezek, 2006)
The use of programs on television has been labelled as a way “… to communicate the subject matter in ways that use the medium of television most effectively.” (B, Rustin, 1971, p.63) From what was once a device for informing viewers had become a vital part of everyday life with more and more people depending on it as a source of entertainment. With its news found power the use of the television began to change, it not only sold products but paid for its programs through the use of interactive methods. We’ve all noticed these subtle methods through out the television programming, “call now and win”, “it’s up to you” and my personal favourite “it’s your show”. By using these catch phrases and specific wording, programs are able to draw viewers into interacting with the television on a higher level than channel surfing. In most cases you wouldn’t realise that you are playing into the hands of the programs creators by taking an interest into the program and spending money to ensure its continuation. (The Impact of Television, T. Macbeth Williams)
Big Brother is a television program which based almost solely on the interactivity of viewers with there opinions helping to alter the foundation of the competition. Now you not only watch the program on your television but on your computer or phone as well which increases your interest in the program. The show works on the premise that viewers vote regularly for there favourite “housemate”to ensure they remain in the competition, every night a list of “housemates in trouble” are announced, this then provokes viewers to vote again for there favourite to ensure they remain in the house. On “eviction night” the hosts make the claim that “your favourite is not out of danger yet so vote now to save your favourite…” this provokes viewers to increase there votes and continue calling even though in some cases the price of voting has increased. “Most of us harbour some guilt feelings about spending, or ‘wasting’, so much time in front of ‘the box’ with so little to show for it…” (Television and its Audience, P. Barwise, A. Ehrenberg, p.137) but now with a result that a viewer can see in a tangible form some of this initial guilt will be removed. By doing this the show increases its daily audience and gains funds for broadcasting and prize money as well as making a profit all from phone polling through the television. (Television and its Audience, P. Barwise, A. Ehrenberg, p.137)
Interactive television has not only increased the amount of money people spend on programs everyday but has increased the amount of time we spend watching television to an average of “22.7 hours per week” (Statistics: Television, 2008) for adults and an average “38 hours (a week)” (Television Statistics, p1. 2008) for children. By using phone polls to help alter television shows, stations are able to monitor which programs are being watched more frequently and have the best effect on persuading viewers to vote. For example if more people voted during the ad break of “Rove” it would generally mean the audience which watches “Rove” are more likely to vote on other days therefore a company can increase the amount of promotions they put in each ad break as “enjoyment evokes responsiveness” (B M. Rustin, p. 63, 1971) in viewers. (N M. Hopkins, A K. Mullis, p. 177-180, 2008)
Television shows can connect with viewers on other levels excluding interactive media, some programs appeal to a person simplest flaw, emotion. Many television shows may not have the best content or the best budget but still gain high ratings by appealing to people’s heart strings. Shows like “Saving Kids”, “RPA” and “RSPCA Rescue” appeal to people not through phone polls but through the way in which a person can connect with the programs content on a deeper level. The synopsis on the “Saving Kids” website states the show is about “Little patients with big stories” (Saving Kids, 2008) This is another example of how television as a standard one way communication medium is able to communicate in a two way form.
In conclusion the way in which television has changed to incorporate new media technologies has allowed corporations to find yet another way to increase the amount of time we spend in front of the television. By incorporating phones and the internet into everyday programs, television was able to connect with a viewer on another level above the average one way communication technique. With its current status continuing to change it is no doubt that the future of interactive television is set to rise as it becomes less of one way communication medium and transforms into a two way communication form.
Bibliography
Book Sources
“The Macquarie History of Ideas”
Macquarie Library Pty. Ltd. 1983, p832-835.
“Television and its Audience”
SAGE Communications in Society Series, P Barwise, A Ehrenberg, p 137, SAGE Publications Ltd, 1988.
Journal Sources
“Inside the Magic Rectangle: Recent Research on the History of Television”
Contemporary European History, J Foot, p. 467- 475, Cambridge University Press, Unite Kingdom, 2002
“Family Perceptions of Television Viewing Habits”
Family Relations, Vol. 34. No. 2, N M. Hopkins, A K. Mullis, p. 177-180, National Council on Family Relations, 1985
“Looking at Television Isn’t Enough”
Music Educators Journal, vol 57. No.5, Technology in Music Teaching, B M. Rustin, p.63, The National Association for Music Education, 1971.
Internet Sources
“Television Statistics”
http://sociomedia.ibelgique.com/tvstats.htm, No Author, Date Accessed 22/04/08.
“Statistics on TV Viewing Habits (1994-2000)”
Media Awareness Network, http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/ research_documents/statistics/television/tv_viewing_habits.cfm, 2008.
“Saving Kids”
Synopsis, http://ten.com.au/ten/savingkids-synopsis.html, Network Ten, 2008.
“The History of Television”
Timeline of TV History, http://www.thehistoryoftelevision.com/, Geno Jezek, 2006.
“The Impact of Television: A Natural Experiment in Three Communities”
http://world.std.com/`jlr/comment/tv_impact.htm, T Macbeth Williams, J Redford, 1995.
New Communication Technologies
Essay
Megan Pope-s2676113
Thursday 1-3pm
Chris Mamo Zelos
How Television Interacts As A One Way Communication Platform.
Television was once a black and white box which showed us the technology of the future, but since its humble beginning the television has evolved into an interactive medium which influences the way we view programs.
The first television was created in 1926 by John Baird who created the first workable television set out of a series of strips of light and shaded images. In 1928 Baird “created colour television by scanning in primary colours” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) onto alternative strips of the shaded images to create a moving colour image. The television proceeded to evolve through time and in the 1930’s the invention of the iconoscope “saw a boom in television technology” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) with more companies getting involved with the television market. As this new technology developed so did the televisions development in Britain with a “total television system including a camera tube known as an Emitron”( Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834) being created by a British research group. In 1938 another breakthrough occurred in the field of television with the creation of a “transmission system that could that could be received by both black and white and colour sets” (Macquarie History Of Ideas, p 834). After the basic transmission system had been created the worldwide invasion of television began with it soon invading households around the western world. (Inside the Magic Rectangle: Recent Research on the History of Television, J. Foot, 1992) (The History of Television, Jezek, 2006)
The use of programs on television has been labelled as a way “… to communicate the subject matter in ways that use the medium of television most effectively.” (B, Rustin, 1971, p.63) From what was once a device for informing viewers had become a vital part of everyday life with more and more people depending on it as a source of entertainment. With its news found power the use of the television began to change, it not only sold products but paid for its programs through the use of interactive methods. We’ve all noticed these subtle methods through out the television programming, “call now and win”, “it’s up to you” and my personal favourite “it’s your show”. By using these catch phrases and specific wording, programs are able to draw viewers into interacting with the television on a higher level than channel surfing. In most cases you wouldn’t realise that you are playing into the hands of the programs creators by taking an interest into the program and spending money to ensure its continuation. (The Impact of Television, T. Macbeth Williams)
Big Brother is a television program which based almost solely on the interactivity of viewers with there opinions helping to alter the foundation of the competition. Now you not only watch the program on your television but on your computer or phone as well which increases your interest in the program. The show works on the premise that viewers vote regularly for there favourite “housemate”to ensure they remain in the competition, every night a list of “housemates in trouble” are announced, this then provokes viewers to vote again for there favourite to ensure they remain in the house. On “eviction night” the hosts make the claim that “your favourite is not out of danger yet so vote now to save your favourite…” this provokes viewers to increase there votes and continue calling even though in some cases the price of voting has increased. “Most of us harbour some guilt feelings about spending, or ‘wasting’, so much time in front of ‘the box’ with so little to show for it…” (Television and its Audience, P. Barwise, A. Ehrenberg, p.137) but now with a result that a viewer can see in a tangible form some of this initial guilt will be removed. By doing this the show increases its daily audience and gains funds for broadcasting and prize money as well as making a profit all from phone polling through the television. (Television and its Audience, P. Barwise, A. Ehrenberg, p.137)
Interactive television has not only increased the amount of money people spend on programs everyday but has increased the amount of time we spend watching television to an average of “22.7 hours per week” (Statistics: Television, 2008) for adults and an average “38 hours (a week)” (Television Statistics, p1. 2008) for children. By using phone polls to help alter television shows, stations are able to monitor which programs are being watched more frequently and have the best effect on persuading viewers to vote. For example if more people voted during the ad break of “Rove” it would generally mean the audience which watches “Rove” are more likely to vote on other days therefore a company can increase the amount of promotions they put in each ad break as “enjoyment evokes responsiveness” (B M. Rustin, p. 63, 1971) in viewers. (N M. Hopkins, A K. Mullis, p. 177-180, 2008)
Television shows can connect with viewers on other levels excluding interactive media, some programs appeal to a person simplest flaw, emotion. Many television shows may not have the best content or the best budget but still gain high ratings by appealing to people’s heart strings. Shows like “Saving Kids”, “RPA” and “RSPCA Rescue” appeal to people not through phone polls but through the way in which a person can connect with the programs content on a deeper level. The synopsis on the “Saving Kids” website states the show is about “Little patients with big stories” (Saving Kids, 2008) This is another example of how television as a standard one way communication medium is able to communicate in a two way form.
In conclusion the way in which television has changed to incorporate new media technologies has allowed corporations to find yet another way to increase the amount of time we spend in front of the television. By incorporating phones and the internet into everyday programs, television was able to connect with a viewer on another level above the average one way communication technique. With its current status continuing to change it is no doubt that the future of interactive television is set to rise as it becomes less of one way communication medium and transforms into a two way communication form.
Bibliography
Book Sources
“The Macquarie History of Ideas”
Macquarie Library Pty. Ltd. 1983, p832-835.
“Television and its Audience”
SAGE Communications in Society Series, P Barwise, A Ehrenberg, p 137, SAGE Publications Ltd, 1988.
Journal Sources
“Inside the Magic Rectangle: Recent Research on the History of Television”
Contemporary European History, J Foot, p. 467- 475, Cambridge University Press, Unite Kingdom, 2002
“Family Perceptions of Television Viewing Habits”
Family Relations, Vol. 34. No. 2, N M. Hopkins, A K. Mullis, p. 177-180, National Council on Family Relations, 1985
“Looking at Television Isn’t Enough”
Music Educators Journal, vol 57. No.5, Technology in Music Teaching, B M. Rustin, p.63, The National Association for Music Education, 1971.
Internet Sources
“Television Statistics”
http://sociomedia.ibelgique.com/tvstats.htm, No Author, Date Accessed 22/04/08.
“Statistics on TV Viewing Habits (1994-2000)”
Media Awareness Network, http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/ research_documents/statistics/television/tv_viewing_habits.cfm, 2008.
“Saving Kids”
Synopsis, http://ten.com.au/ten/savingkids-synopsis.html, Network Ten, 2008.
“The History of Television”
Timeline of TV History, http://www.thehistoryoftelevision.com/, Geno Jezek, 2006.
“The Impact of Television: A Natural Experiment in Three Communities”
http://world.std.com/`jlr/comment/tv_impact.htm, T Macbeth Williams, J Redford, 1995.